Skip to main content

Roe v. Wade Overturned: US Supreme Court strikes down 49 year old law.

In a landmark decision that took close to 50 years, the pro-lifers in the United States have achieved what seemed impossible, the overturning of the Roe versus Wade ruling. The ruling was passed 49 years ago in 1973. Here are the details of the case that changed a generation's view on reproductive health, women's rights and child birth. 


 

Roe versus Wade, 1973

The actual case was filed in 1969, by Norma McCorvey, who took the legal pseudonym "Jane Roe" to protect her identity at the time. McCorvey became pregnant with her third child at the time and decided she wanted to have an abortion, but she was living in Texas, where abortions are illegal except in the case where the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother. Her attorneys filed a lawsuit on her behalf in the US federal court against her local district's attorney, Henry Wade, alleging that Texas' abortion laws were unconstitutional. 

The three judge panel of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled in favor of Ms. McCorvey and declared the abortion law unconstitutional. Wade and his team immediately appealed this decision in the Supreme Court of the United States. 

On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision that the "Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental right to privacy, which protects a pregnant woman's right to abortion". (Wikipedia) The Court however noted that the "right to abortion was not absolute and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and prenatal life". (Wikipedia)

To resolve these two competing interests the rights of the mother to health/life and the life of the child the Court came up with this solution:

They developed a trimester timetable in evaluating the viability of the life of the child:
  • Within the first trimester (first 3 months), state governments could not regulate abortion, except that the abortion be done by a licensed physician 
  • Within the second trimester (up to 6 month mark) governments could now regulate the procedure but only for the purpose of protecting the mother's health and in regard to fetal life. 
  • Within the third trimester (up to 9 months), also taking into account the last few week of the second trimester, governments properly regulate and even prohibit abortions, providing that their laws allowed the exception of cases where the mother's health and/or life was at risk.  
Of note, the Supreme Court of the day, classified abortion rights as "fundamental", which required the courts to evaluate any challenge to the abortion laws with "strict scrutiny", a standard that is the highest upheld by US courts concerning judicial review.

So what happened today?

The law was overturned. A panel of nine (9) Supreme Court Justices reviewed the Roe v. Wade ruling and found that it was unconstitutional. 

Writing on behalf of the majority in favor of the ruling, Justice Samuel Alito said that the 1973 ruling and other similar court decisions which buttressed Roe v. Wade, were "egregiously wrong" and asserted that the arguments were "exceptionally weak" and so "damaging" they could be considered "an abuse of judicial authority".  (Totenberg, 2022)

The ratio in this decision was 6-3, with Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, as well as Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch in favor of overruling the law. 

The 78 page document/review cast down the claim of the previous ruling (1973) which stated a woman's right of privacy could be upheld under the 14th Amendment. Instead, Justice Alito asserted that this claim could not be made to defend abortion as a right to privacy, as there "... is no inherent right to privacy or personal autonomy in various provisions of the Constitution". (Totenberg, 2022)

In fact, in his writings, Justice Alito alluded to the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where in that instance the Justices who presided over the case though siding with Planned Parenthood in upholding Roe, did concede that Roe v. Wade and other court rulings could not be relied upon as a solid defense since "contraception could prevent almost all unplanned pregnancies". (Totenberg, 2022)

Mississippi Law

The ruling does not completely stop women from having abortions however, as the states have the discretion to pass and/or uphold local legislation making it legal in their jurisdiction. No doubt though, several states such as Mississippi, which triggered this current review on "abortion rights" with the stricter laws they enacted in 2018, may seek to ban or put in tougher laws to restrict the procedure. The Mississippi Abortion Law makes abortion illegal after 15 weeks, two (2) months earlier than the limit set by Roe v. Wade. 

Here is the key phrase:  
"...a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform...or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks..."

Most experts deem a fetus viable at about 24 weeks. The legality of the Act was challenged in federal court therefore blocking the enforcement of the law. The case was first heard in December 2021, by the Supreme Court, and now, here we are. 

 

References:
  1. Wikipedia. Roe v. Wade, Last updated 24 June 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
  2. Nina Totenberg. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending right to abortion upheld for decades, Special Series: Reproductive Rights in America, NPR News, published 24 June, 2022. 2022, https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn
  3. Viable - Medical experts say a pregnancy is viable where the baby has reached a stage of development where after it is born, it can reasonably survive outside of the womb.

What do you think folks, did the Justices of the US Supreme Court get it right this time or should the previous ruling of Roe v. Wade been upheld?

Please leave a comment below.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bank reform: Finance Minister, Dr. Nigel Clarke, hints at new financial regulations.

  Jamaica's Finance Minister, Dr. Nigel Clarke  Dr. Nigel Clarke, Minister of Finance, has hinted in an online forum hosted on Twitter, that there will be new regulations coming that should protect the Jamaican consumers in the financial space. Dr. Clarke said: "The  government of Jamaica will be tabling very shortly sweeping regulatory that provides consumer protection , and I'll probably say more about that later. With respect to fees and banking fees, one of the things that is happening in our society today but we're not, uh... we don't, we're not conscious of it as a society is a shift away from brick and mortar into electronic and digital realm, and what has been happening is that the sector that is at the forefront of that transition is actually the banking sector." Dr. Clarke recently received scathing criticism from PNP Members of Parliament Fitz Jackson  

News: Foreigners competing for Jamaican jobs? Government to give foreigners one year residency to live and work in island.

Speaking last year at the opening ceremony for a new Passport Immigration and Citizenship Agency (PICA) office at the Fairview Plaza in Montego Bay, Minister of National Security Dr. Horace Chang, revealed that a submission will soon be made to Cabinet for the agency to grant a one year temporary residency to eligible foreign nationals. Nearing the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr Chang noted, an increase in travel to the island will be expected. 

COVID-19 VACCINES: mRNA vaccines could cause face paralysis.

Back in December 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) had issued a warning to health care workers, who administer the giving of both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines to closely monitor the recipients for side effects such as Bell's Palsy. Among the 30,000 trial participants for Moderna, three of the persons who received the vaccine experienced Bell's Palsy. For the Pfizer vaccine, 43,000 persons were in their trial group, four of their participants who received the vaccine suffered from this side effect. 

Job Market Trends: Some traditional careers no longer in high demand in the Jamaican job market.

 In a shocking statement Dr. Merritt Henry, manager for student services and development, placement and career services at the University of the West Indies, Mona campus, declared that: “… We are preparing job seekers with skills and competencies that are demanded, but not enough…there is a disconnect between what the employers would want to have and what secondary and tertiary institutions are sending out…but it is not that we are not preparing these persons,” This statement was captured during the Jamaica Observer's Monday Exchange, which took place on February 20, 2017, held at the Observer's Kingston headquarters. She was among a team of representatives from the Youth Upliftment Through Employment (YUTE) Limited, who spoke on the issue of whether the education system is equipping youth job seekers with the skills demanded by employers.